Reactie plaatsen

jammer dat je met emrakul nog steeds moet saccen

Maar deze is minder effectief tegen emrakul dan tegen progentinus

Emraku vind ik toch wel harder hoor, protenigus overleeft je wel 1 x.. een emraku is het nagenoeg meteen scoop

progenitus IS de ultimate. Unstopable 10 dmg per beurt? au.

I name.... "Super Mario".

Sinds wanneer heeft Progenitus een ultimate <,<

of voor progenitus en zijn ultimate

Ja, dat kan je met deze kaart doen ja.

bescherming voor jace zijn ultimate???

@ Djienn

lol je hebt in ieder geval een rijke fantasie met je "destroy all opponents"

hier

Beschermt protection ook tegen destroy? Bijvoorbeeld een kaart met "destroy all opponents"??

Dus, als ik me niet vergis.. Behalve dat ik niet wist hoe het werkte met annihilator, had ik het helemaal goed. Hoera voor Lennart!

Je valt overigens nog wel gewoon het team aan, en als je een speler niet aan kan vallen kan je het team niet aan vallen. Voor dingen als Annihilator moet je wel een speler uitkiezen.

806.8a Each team's creatures attack the other team as a group. During the combat phase, the active team is the attacking team and each player on the active team is an attacking player. Likewise,
the nonactive team is the defending team and each player on the nonactive team is a defending player.

806.8b Any one-shot effect that refers to the "defending player" refers to one specific defending player, not to both of the defending players. The controller of the effect chooses which one the spell or ability refers to at the time the effect is applied. The same is true for any one-shot effect that refers to the "attacking player."

Any characteristic-defining ability that refers to the "defending player" refers to one specific defending player, not to both of the defending players. The controller of the object with the characteristic-defining ability chooses which one the ability refers to at the time the nonactive players become defending players.

All other cases in which the "defending player" is referred to actually refer to both defending players. If the reference involves a positive comparison (such as asking whether the defending player controls an Island) or a relative comparison (such as asking whether you control more creatures than the defending player), it gets only one answer. This answer is "yes" if either defending player in the comparison would return a "yes" answer if compared individually. If the reference involves a negative comparison (such as asking whether the defending player controls no black permanents), it also gets only one answer. This answer is "yes" if performing the analogous positive comparison would return a "no" answer. The same is true for all other cases that refer to the "attacking player."
806.8c As the declare attackers step begins, the active team declares attackers. If an effect of an object controlled by a defending player prohibits a creature from attacking him or her, that creature can't attack the defending team. The active team has one combined attack, and that set of attacking creatures must be legal as a whole. See rule 508.1.
Example: One player in a Two-Headed Giant game controls Teferi's Moat, which says "As Teferi's Moat comes into play, choose a color." and "Creatures of the chosen color without flying can't attack you." Creatures of the chosen color without flying can't attack that player's team.

Ah, ik heb het gevonden, je hebt helemaal gelijk. Mijn excuses.

Eveneens uit de FAQ:

How is combat damage assigned?
As the combat damage step begins, the active team announces how each attacking creature will assign its combat damage. If an attacking creature would assign combat damage to the defending team, the active team chooses only one of the defending players for that creature to assign its combat damage to. Then the defending team announces how each blocking creature will assign its combat damage.